Analysis of Management Strategies for the Aircraft Production Ramp-up


New product ramp-up in the aircraft industry is a complex process due to the high number of changes that happen both in product and production processes at the manufacturing stage, which can increase aircraft lead time dramatically. Also, aircrafts are complex, small series products that are highly customized for specific customer needs, which makes launching a new product even more difficult. Today, ramp-ups have become more frequent as the average product lifecycle decreases. All of these issues can make ramp-ups a major challenge for aircraft industry production engineers.

The Airbus Group joined the European Union ARUM (Adaptive Production Management) project, which is focused on creating an IT solution for risk reduction, decision-making, and planning during new product ramp-ups. The project is aimed mainly at aircraft and shipbuilding industries.

Simulation was chosen as a part of the ARUM solution, because it would allow the participants to reproduce the real production facility experience (based on the use case provided by the Airbus Group), and thus provide a benchmark for the ARUM solution testing. AnyLogic was the selected simulation software due to its capability to combine agent-based models with discrete-event approach.


The simulation model included a part of the Hamburg Airbus A350 assembly line where two different pieces of the fuselage were completed. This part of the line consisted of six assembly stations with 30-35 people working at each one and approximately 300 work orders per station. The challenge was to simulate the ramp-up process where general productivity increased over time, with the whole ramp-up period lasting up to two years.

The agent-based and discrete-event model consisted of three types of elements:

  • The flow line, that included working stations, each one with its own labor and physical resources. The stations were modeled as agents.  
  • The products (sections), going through the flow line parts. Each section required 200-600 work orders assigned to stations. Work orders formed tasks that required specific materials and resources. When a section entered a station, it started going through work processes modeled using the Process Modeling Library, then left and moved to the next station, and finally, to the assembly line in a different city, which was not modeled. 
  • The control model included plans that were sometimes affected by disturbances. The controller agent modeled the complex behavior of human managers reacting to disturbance events with control strategies.
Simulation based solution architecture

ARUM solution structure.

Among others, the control strategies included open work policy alternatives. This meant that if some of the work could not be done at the moment, it could be delayed until some other point, while the product continued to move beyond this assembly line to the facility in the other city. In this case, Hamburg workers would have to travel to the other facility to complete the work (“traveling work” strategy). Alternatively, the work could be suspended until the disturbance was resolved (“stop and fix” strategy).

The disturbances that occurred during the ramp-up included:

  • Unbalanced workload and resource allocation due to the workers’ learning curve and the fact that the same line produced several different products. 
  • Design non-conformities and changes, as production often began with a not completely prepared product. 
  • Missing material or material incompatibilities due to late design changes.

The measured model statistics included achieved aircraft lead time, amount of traveling work used, and resource utilization rates (labor, materials, and stations).

The experts created a model that was easy to understand and reuse, and that was integrated to the ARUM solution architecture. It also included the visualization of the assembly line.

Production simulation model structure
Simulation model structure. 


The model was run to simulate the impact of the disturbance mitigation strategies currently being applied at the Airbus facility, including “stop-and-fix” and “traveling work” strategies.

The modelers tested multiple ramp-up scenarios with different sets of production plans. They also tried multiple sets of disturbances based on historic data, including extreme scenarios.

The model will be used for comparing plans suggested by the ARUM suite to the current management practices. This will allow development of the best disturbance mitigation strategies for aerospace and shipbuilding manufacturing industries’ ramp-ups.

More Case Studies

  • GE Manufacturing Plant Uses AnyLogic for Real Time Decision Support
    In 2012, GE opened a new battery manufacturing plant in conjunction with the launch of an innovative energy storage business. GE’s exciting opportunity brought on many new challenges, such as increasing production throughput and yield under evolving processes and uncertainties, and reducing manufacturing costs in order to gain market share. The GE Global Research Center sought out a powerful and flexible tool to analyze, not just the specific process, but the manufacturing system as a whole.
  • Shipyard Capacity Analysis
    With AnyLogic simulation software as the centerpiece, NASSCO utilizes a custom-built analysis system called the Large Scale Computer Simulation Modeling System for Shipbuilding (LSMSe) to provide highly detailed and accurate capacity analyses for both current production and potential new work.
  • Production Planning in Marine Industry
    The managers of one of the most important Italian yacht manufacturers needed a new, intelligent approach that would make the planning process simpler. The objective was to give the real production planner exceptionally rich planning information, which would allow the person to test and refine a plan before its implementation.
  • Simulating Ice Cream Production: Recognizing Constraints and Optimizing Production Plan
    Conaprole, the biggest dairy production company in Uruguay, produces more than 150 SKUs in their ice cream plant, using five production lines, and up to five different packaging configurations for each line. The management’s challenge was to be able to reformulate their plans in order to balance supply and demand and make sure they would avoid stock-outs in key products. They also sought ways to optimize the use of their production capacities.
  • Simple Simulation Model Helps Intel Avoid Production Plant Downtime
    Intel factories used a particular type of equipment that often broke down, which caused capacity constraints. These expensive parts were used in critical factory operations, and the repairs took significant time, so it was necessary to have extra spare parts on hand to avoid downtimes. Broken parts caused constraints at some of the factories while other factories over purchased spares.
  • Improving Mining Outbound Logistics with Agent-Based Simulation Modeling
    One of the largest resource companies in the world, with over $80 billion in sales, decided to enter a new market. It was planning to build a new potash mine with 90% of the resources exported. They wanted to design a reliable supply chain, with a high speed of supply replenishing, and the ability to recover from natural disasters and man-made crises benefiting from such volatility. Amalgama and Goldratt companies contracted this project to design the potash mining operations and a full supply chain of outbound logistics.
  • Modeling and Optimization of Oil Production Using AnyLogic Fluid Library
    Canada is the third largest country to have oil reserves. However, most of the oil is in oil sand – the mixture of sand, oil, and water – which has to be heated up with steam to emit the oil. It is costly to maintain such a distribution system, and outages may lead to disruptions in steam injection and oil production. Stream Systems company applied AnyLogic simulation modeling to optimize expenditures and capture production lags
  • Highly Automated Production Line Planning and Optimization
    Centrotherm Photovoltaics AG is a global supplier of technology and equipment for the photovoltaics, semiconductor, and microelectronics industries. The company needed to identify the best automated production line and factory configuration to minimize costs and maximize throughput and reliability.
  • Simulation of the Construction of a Tunnel with a Tunnel Boring Machine
    The cost of one hour of down time of a tunnel boring machine is usually high and project managers have to do their best to avoid unnecessary delays in construction. The aim of the simulation project, which was carried out at Ruhr University Bochum in Germany, was to create a simulation model that would be capable of determining the bottlenecks in tunnel building processes in order to minimize the possible monetary losses.
  • Shipyard Proves Order Fulfillment Capability and Gains Visibility into Production Facility and Distribution
    Faced with a large order for diesel powered submarines, Admiralty Shipyards JSC must evaluate whether the current production facilities can fulfill the order, and if not, what amount can be produced by the year 2016. Admiralty Shipyards JSC is also seeking confirmation that an additional production facility will not be needed to complete the order.